non slip socks for women-slip socks have been steered as a method of preventing accidental falls due to slips. This examine compared the relative slip resistance of commercially available non-slip socks with other foot circumstances, namely bare ft, compression stockings and traditional socks, in an effort to decide any traction benefit.
Part one concerned slip resistance testing of commercially available non-slip socks and one compression-stocking sample by way of an unbiased blinded materials testing laboratory using a Wet Pendulum Test.
Section two of the study involved in-situ testing amongst healthy adult topics (n = 3). Subjects stood unsupported on a variable angle, inclined platform topped with hospital grade vinyl, in a range of foot situations (bare feet, non-slip socks, typical socks and compression stockings). Inclination was elevated incrementally for every condition till slippage of any magnitude was detected. The platform angle was monitored using a spatial orientation tracking sensor and slippage point was recorded on video.
Part one outcomes generated via Wet Pendulum Test advised that non-slip socks didn’t supply better traction than compression stockings. Nevertheless, in section , slippage in compression stockings was detected at the lowest angles throughout all participants. Amongst the foot circumstances tested, barefoot circumstances produced the highest slip angles for all contributors indicating that this foot situation offered the highest slip resistance.
It’s evident that naked feet provide higher slip resistance than non-slip socks and due to this fact might represent a safer foot condition. This research did not discover whether traction offered by bare ft was comparable to ‘optimal’ footwear resembling shoes. Nonetheless, previous research have related barefoot mobilisation with increased falls. Subsequently, it is prompt that all patients proceed to be inspired to mobilise in acceptable, nicely-fitting shoes whilst in hospital. Limitations of this research in relation to the testing technique, participant group and pattern size are discussed.